american modern tanks russian modern armored cars

Its response will therefore have to revolve around the use of force and threats thereof. But the context has changed, in an alarming way.Īs the Kremlin feels bound to retaliate for what it claims is unjustified ostracism for Salisbury, it is hamstrung by not having the economic muscle to respond in kind to tougher economic sanctions. That does not mean the matter of the Javelins has been forgotten or forgiven. On March 4, though, the Salisbury poisoning temporarily overshadowed the standoff over Ukraine. Given dire warnings from various Russian sources against such a step, one would have expected a quick flare-up. stood ready to increase its commitment to Ukraine’s cause. It was a symbolically important step, signaling that the U.S. The long-standing issue of whether the West should supply lethal weapons to Ukraine gained a new twist on March 1, 2018, when, following lengthy internal deliberations and much pressure from the Pentagon, the State Department of the United States authorized the sale to Ukraine of 210 modern anti-tank missiles, the Javelin.

The Kremlin is in a position never to allow having its proxy forces in the Donbas region routed.

Moscow is likely to respond by ratcheting up the military conflict in Ukraine and its pressure on the Baltic states.anti-tank weapons has more political than military import Washington’s decision to let Ukraine have advanced U.S.

American modern tanks russian modern armored cars